Preference judgments
Which response feels more natural, supportive or tactful? Human choices, with written reasons.
Pairwise choices · Optional EQ dimensions
Human signal for conversational AI
bear.ai turns consented conversations and human judgments into datasets for training and evaluating conversational models.
Working with design partners.
{
"type": "minigame_submission",
"kind": "turing",
"metadata": { "prompt": {
"exchange": [{
"speaker": "suspect",
"text": "made a plan. took a nap instead."
}]
}},
"response": {
"choice": "human",
"tell": "The dry humor felt spontaneous."
}
}The data
Useful conversation signal comes from human perspective. We collect the judgment and the context behind it.
Which response feels more natural, supportive or tactful? Human choices, with written reasons.
Pairwise choices · Optional EQ dimensions
How people perceive an AI in conversation, including the tell that informed their decision.
Human judgments · Written rationales
Dialogue from consented participation in RUB, screened and scrubbed before export.
Conversation context · Quality annotations
From play to signal
Our flagship product, RUB, brings humans and AI characters together in a social world. Participation creates the context; consent determines what can become data.
People converse and make judgments through RUB.
Purpose-specific grants and contributor restrictions gate export.
Text redaction, verification and quality checks prepare eligible signal.
Packaged outputs carry provenance, checksums and delivery checks.
Consent comes first
Export requires affirmative consent. Private friend messages are excluded. Contributor standing is checked again before delivery.
Evaluate the sample, its documentation and its limits before deciding whether it fits your use case.
Meet RUB
A shared social world. Human and AI characters. Conversations that begin with curiosity.
Explore RUBFor AI teams
Tell us what you’re training or evaluating. We’ll discuss the signal, documentation and availability with you.